Pandero is a collective fund management company that has been in the market for more than 54 years.
A complaint against Pandero’s Central Marketing Manager was received, for allegedly committing the crime of fraud against an associate, who claimed to have been deceived when the Pandero System was explained to him. This complaint was important not only because it questioned the procedure for contracting with the company, but also because one of the managers was included as the alleged perpetrator, and it was necessary to avoid any type of sanction against him.
We acted as legal advisors of the client, and based on the supporting documentation on the commercial relationship, a defense pleading was prepared, attaching documentation and participating in the scheduled proceedings. In addition, we met with the Prosecutor in charge to present our arguments.
In this way, the Prosecutor’s Office issued a disposition to close the case, considering that the facts denounced had no criminal relevance and that the complainant was aware of the terms of the contract signed with Pandero before making the payment, which would fall within the victim’s jurisdiction.
This decision was appealed by the complainant and the Superior Public Prosecutor’s Office issued a new disposition, confirming the closure of the case.
